22 years ago: Arson tire dump fire melts I-95 in Philly







































Michela Winberg reports for BillyPenn:

A four-alarm fire consumed a junkyard on the border of Kensington and Port Richmond this week, and it was a big one. It took four hours for firefighters to get the blaze under control, and residents saw fireballs shooting into the sky. But chaotic as the scene was on Tuesday night, it wasn’t the first time a scrap fire struck the area — and it certainly wasn’t the most destructive.
Twenty-two years ago, a giant tire fire ravaged a Port Richmond block. The aftermath included prison time and a several-month shutdown of four miles along I-95.
For those who weren’t around back then — and those who remember it all too clearly — here’s a recap of what went down in the Great Tire Fire of 1996.

‘At least’ 10,000 tires stored illegally

On March 13 of that year, a fire erupted on a 500-square-foot lot where a pile of tires was being illegally stored under I-95.
According to the New York Times, which called the incident “suspicious” from the get-go, the blaze then spread to three adjacent buildings owned by the Philadelphia Tire Disposal Company. It burned for five hours, sent up smoke plumes visible for 30 miles, and reached a whopping eight alarms before the 180 firefighters called in managed to bring it under control.
“We know there were at least 10,000 tires there, and that’s a low estimate,” Capt. Henry Dolberry, then-assistant to the Philadelphia Fire Commissioner, told NYT.

22 years ago: Arson tire dump fire melts I-95 in Philly Read More »

Acting PA chief says he sees himself as an environmentalist

Andrew Wheeler with E&E News reporters Kevin Bogardus and Robin Bravender and EPA press official James Hewitt. Photo credit: Patrick G. Ryan

EPA acting Administrator Andrew Wheeler in his office with (left to right) E&E News reporters Kevin
Bogardus and Robin Bravender and EPA press official James Hewitt. Patrick G. Ryan
Robin Bravender and Kevin Bogardus report for E&E News
Andrew Wheeler, who took over as acting EPA administrator Monday after Scott Pruitt resigned the top job last week, has sparred with environmentalists in his former roles as a coal lobbyist and a longtime staffer to Republican Oklahoma Sen. Jim Inhofe.
But he’s quick to wear the label.
“I’ve always considered myself to be an environmentalist,” he told E&E News today in an interview in his third-floor office at EPA headquarters. “I go hiking, I go camping, I’ve always done that. My favorite job I’ve ever had in my life was being the nature conservation director at a Boy Scout summer camp when I was in college in Ohio.”
So far, that’s been Wheeler’s favorite job, he said, “although it only paid $1,000 for the entire summer.” He added, “I’m reserving judgment on this job to see if this will be my new favorite.”
He said he doesn’t have any political aspirations: “I haven’t thought beyond being acting administrator.”
Wheeler keeps a Magic 8 Ball on the coffee table in his new office. He says he consults it when he needs answers.
Many of the walls are still bare after Pruitt’s belongings were removed. Wheeler’s frames are wrapped in plastic and leaning against the wall. Among them, he’s got a sheet that tallies the roll call vote that was taken in the Senate when he was confirmed as Pruitt’s deputy administrator on April 12. Three months later, he moved into the EPA chief’s office after Pruitt’s abrupt departure. As for his new title, he suggested “Andrew.” Some of his staff call him “Administrator Wheeler.”
His early speeches and interviews have suggested that he plans to steer EPA along the same deregulatory path that President Trump and Pruitt laid out. But he suggested today he’s open to making at least some tweaks around the edges on some of Pruitt’s policy proposals.
And while he steers clear of criticizing his predecessor, he’s stated that he wants to boost transparency at EPA and make inroads with some of the career staff that have felt spurned by the Trump administration.
One of the early moves he made was to open a hallway that runs past the administrator’s office and connects EPA’s north and south buildings. It had been shut under Pruitt, which angered some career employees.
“I intend to keep it open,” Wheeler said today. “I guess it was probably in one of your publications, I read an anonymous EPA employee complaining about that a few weeks ago in an article, saying how they used to walk through it all the time, and if they had outside visitors, they would show them the hallway. I was going to talk to Administrator Pruitt about it, but when I took over, I just went ahead and opened it up, because it should be open. Employees should be able to walk through there.”
As for agency scientists who have felt alienated by the Trump administration, Wheeler said, “I’m telling them every day that I value their work.”
On questions about retaliation against EPA employees who criticized Pruitt’s spending and management, Wheeler said he hasn’t examined those issues. But, he said, “I take accusations of retaliation very seriously, and I would want a full investigation of those.”
Wheeler suggested he would continue to pursue some of Pruitt’s most contentious policy priorities at EPA, like overhauling science advisory boards, requiring data used in rulemaking to be publicly accessible, and repealing and replacing President Obama’s Clean Power Plan, he said today, although he said he’d be looking at them carefully.
And he said he’s being cautious about avoiding conflicts of interest, even as he’s coming under fire for his lobbying career with the coal giant Murray Energy Corp.
“I’ve gone through all of this with our career ethics people, and they don’t see any conflicts. I will not meet with my former client, and I am not meeting with my former law firm. I’m not meeting with any of my former clients that I’ve worked on over the last two years,” Wheeler said today.
Wheeler hasn’t used the soundproof booth that Pruitt installed in the administrator’s office, he said today. Pruitt came under fire for the hefty price tag of the booth.
“It would be expensive to tear it apart, I don’t see any sense in tearing it apart,” Wheeler said. “And in this day and age, I don’t know what the assessment was for the need of it. I did look into the cost of the booth after I got here.”
It looks “like a phone booth,” Wheeler said. “It is in a storage closet, and it does not look that impressive.”
Click here to read a full transcript of the interview.


Acting PA chief says he sees himself as an environmentalist Read More »

Appeal delays Pinelands vote on fire-tower tree clearing

David Levinsky reports for the Burlington County Times:


The full 15-member commission was scheduled to vote on the application from the state Department of Environmental Protection to clear just over 16 acres of trees from around the tower during its meeting Friday, but the vote was postponed due to a third-party appeal filed by one of the plan’s opponents.
PEMBERTON TOWNSHIP — The New Jersey Pinelands Commission delayed a vote on a controversial proposal to clear more than 3,000 non-native trees that are impeding the views from the Bass River State Forest fire tower.
The full 15-member commission was scheduled to vote on the application from the state Department of Environmental Protection to clear just over 16 acres of trees from around the tower during its meeting Friday, but the vote was postponed due to a third-party appeal filed by one of the plan’s opponents.
Carol Bitzberger, a Bass River resident who testified against the tree clearing during a public hearing on the application on June 8, filed an appeal with the commission in response to the commission’s executive director and staff recommendation that the tree clearing be approved due to the safety risk the trees pose to operations at the 86-foot-tall fire tower, which is used by the state Forest Fire Service to spot smoke from forest fires and to report conditions to firefighters on the ground.
The white pines and other trees around the tower were planted in the 1930s by the Civilian Conservation Corps and have now grown over 90 feet high, obstructing the views from the tower to the north, east and south.

Appeal delays Pinelands vote on fire-tower tree clearing Read More »

Ireland would be first country to divest from fossil fuels

Smokestacks loom over Bull Island, northeast of Dublin, in 2008. Dave Walsh/VW Pics/UIG via Getty Images
Colin Dwyer reports for NPR:
The Republic of Ireland took a crucial step Thursday toward becoming the first country in the world to divest from fossil fuels. Lawmakers in the Dail, the lower house of parliament, advanced a bill requiring the Irish government’s more than $10 billion national investment fund to sell off stakes in coal, oil, gas, and peat — and to do so “as soon as practicable.”
The bill now heads to the upper chamber, known as Seanad, where it is expected to pass easily when it’s taken up, likely in September. If the bill becomes law, as anticipated, it would rid the European nation of holdings valued at more than $370 million, according to Trócaire, an Irish Catholic aid organization that has pushed hard for the bill.
The principal force behind the bill, independent lawmaker Thomas Pringle, praised the move Thursday as a “moment where we commit to getting serious.”
“Let us show the Irish public and the international community that we are ready to think and act beyond narrow short-term and vested interests,” he told his fellow lawmakers, “and will take the opportunities that lie ahead of us to bring in real change.”

Ireland would be first country to divest from fossil fuels Read More »

NJDEP says: We can’t spot the fire from the forest

Observation deck on the fire tower in Bass River State Forest (NJDEP)















David Levinsky reports for the Burlington County Times:


The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection is seeking Pinelands Commission approval to clear just over 16 acres of trees from around an 86-foot tall fire tower, which is being obstructed by trees planted in Bass River in the 1930s.
BASS RIVER — The next big decision by the New Jersey Pinelands Commission surrounds firefighters’ inability to see the forest for the trees.
White pines and some other non-native trees planted in Bass River in the 1930s have grown over 90 feet high and are now impeding the view from the Bass River State Forest fire tower. The obstruction prompted the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection to seek Pinelands Commission approval to clear just over 16 acres of trees from around the 86-foot tall fire tower, which is used by the state Forest Fire Service to spot smoke from the start of forest fires and to report on conditions to firefighters on the ground.
But while the state has proposed replacing the trees with native species that won’t grow as high, the proposal has generated opposition from area residents upset about the potential loss of trees near a popular trail through the forest. They argue a better solution is for the state to replace the almost 80-year-old structure with a newer, taller tower or that more advanced technology such as drones and cameras be deployed to monitor the forest and detect fires.
There are also historical concerns since some of the trees were planted by the Civilian Conservation Corps, which was created by President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s Depression-era New Deal recovery program. The CCC employed thousands of out-of-work men and is credited with building many trails, bridges, and roads in New Jersey, as well as numerous park projects such as the fire tower.
The full 15-member commission, which is charged with overseeing development and land use within the million-acre Pinelands, is expected to vote on the application during Friday’s meeting.

It could become a lively one, although public comment on the project has officially closed. Nearly a dozen people spoke about the project during last month’s June 8 commission meeting, and the commission also received 31 written comments, with the vast majority opposing the proposed tree harvesting. 

Read the full story

Like this? Click to receive free updates

NJDEP says: We can’t spot the fire from the forest Read More »

Are you kidding? Trump helping off-shore wind energy?

Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke at an offshore wind conference in New Jersey in April.

Editor’s Note: If you follow the normal course of politics, you can no longer doubt that our congress and president, returning from their annual campaign pilgrimages to the pay windows of Big Oil, Big Gas, and Big Coal, will fully renew their pledges to serve and protect the mighty, fossil-fuel gods–until the earth’s final, scorching or drowning days. But what’s this? Now we read (in the E&E News piece below) that Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke, the Trumpsman who wants to drill every square foot of American coastal waters (save Greater Mar a Lago) is making nice in speeches about off-shore wind energy. Hmmm. Something’s not right here. Did a meteor slightly jar earth’s spin while we were all watching the World Cup? If you have a theory, mouse over to our Facebook page and share it. — Frank Brill 


Saqib Rahim reports for E&E News


In April, Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke came to an offshore wind conference in Princeton, N.J., to give remarks on “energy dominance.”

It was a charged moment to be giving the speech. Three months prior, the Trump administration had proposed to open 90 percent of federal waters to oil and gas leasing. Zinke had offered to exempt Florida, prompting an outcry from liberal Northeast states like New Jersey that wanted to move away from fossil fuels.

What Zinke said, to many raised eyebrows in the audience, was that offshore wind, just like oil and gas, fit into the “energy dominance” framework. He said if a state chose wind, it had a friend in the White House.

One audience member said the tone was “almost apologetic.”

“Of the current energy portfolio, probably wind has the greatest opportunity for growth,” said Zinke. “Let’s make American energy great. Let’s make sure we make wind energy great.”

One could easily have imagined a different tone. Zinke, after all, worked for an administration that has cast doubt on climate science, rolled back Obama-era regulations on carbon pollution, and worked to subsidize coal and nuclear plants.

Like this? Click to receive free updates


Offshore wind, after more than a decade of development under Presidents George W. Bush and Obama, could hardly have been a juicier target. The young industry hadn’t yet found a footing in the U.S., and it will need heavy subsidies to get started. For the Northeast states advancing it, most of which had sued over Trump’s climate policies, climate wasn’t a side issue; it’s the point.

But instead of following the same pattern of conflict and lawsuits, offshore wind is on the brink of arrival. A year and a half into the Trump administration, with upheaval all around the U.S. energy world, offshore wind is benefiting from an oddly cooperative dynamic between states and the federal government. The projects envisioned under Obama are moving toward fruition, and if trends hold, the U.S.’s first utility-scale offshore wind project could be under construction by the end of Trump’s first term and operational in 2021.

In Maryland and Massachusetts, regulators have approved financing for two installations of 368 and 800 megawatts, respectively. New Jersey and New York are laying the policy groundwork for 5,900 MW more. California, Connecticut, Delaware, Rhode Island and Virginia are exploring projects and policies of their own.

It’s happened not despite, but thanks to, the help of the U.S. government, offshore wind advocates admit.

“Yeah, I can’t explain it myself,” said Nathanael Greene, director of renewable energy policy at the Natural Resources Defense Council. “I think as a whole, this administration has a lot of people that are probably not actually anti-renewable as much as ‘all-of-the-above’ advocates … [t]hey don’t care about the environmental aspect of it. That’s not what’s driving them. But this is [potentially] a big American industry.”

“I think the administration rightly sees offshore wind as a power source that can help us achieve energy independence and security … and also dominance in the global economy,” said Stephanie McClellan, director of the Special Initiative on Offshore Wind at the University of Delaware. “I don’t want to say it’s not a surprise, but it’s fitting.”

Read the full story


Are you kidding? Trump helping off-shore wind energy? Read More »