NJ lawmakers send bills protecting bees to Gov. Christie



Bills sponsored by New Jersey Assemblymen Ron Dancer and Parker Space protecting the state’s bee population from pesticides await Gov. Chris Christie’s signature or veto.

  The first bill (2016:A3398 / 2016:S2076) requires anyone applying pesticides to notify beekeepers when applying pesticides within three miles of a registered honey or native beehive. It requires beekeepers to register with the DEP by March 1 of each year if they want to be notified.


     The second bill (2016:A3400 / 2016:S2078) requires anyone applying pesticides to complete a training or continuing education course on the effect pesticides have on pollinating bees.


   “Pesticides are toxic to honeybees. They inhibit the bees’ ability to gather food and can also kill them,” said Dancer (R-Ocean). “The state’s 20,000 bee colonies contribute to the production of nearly $200 million worth of fruits and vegetables annually. Protecting these vital pollinators of crops is a priority.”

Like this? Use form in upper right to receive free updates
See popular posts from the last 30 days in right column — >>



     

NJ lawmakers send bills protecting bees to Gov. Christie Read More »

NJ lawmakers flush Christie’s Highlands septic plan


Scott Fallon reports for The Record:



A plan by the Christie administration to allow more development in the most protected regions of the Highlands was shot down by the Legislature late Monday, blocking what many saw as a serious threat to an area that supplies drinking water to millions.


The resolution approved by the Senate and Assembly essentially turns back a plan that would have permitted as many as 1,145 more septic systems to be built in New Jersey’s mountain region dotted with reservoirs and aquifers. 


“The Legislature showed its commitment to the citizens it represents by this action, which is intentionally an arduous procedure and a last resort,” said Elliott Ruga, policy director of the New Jersey Highlands Coalition.


The resolution passed the Senate 21-16 and the Assembly 41-25 during a dizzying legislative session that saw 200 measures approved in one day. It essentially says the septic plan is invalid because it defies the intent of the 2004 Highlands Act, a law that severely limited development to protect drinking water.


Read the full Record story


Tom Johnson, in NJ Spotlight, writes:


The action represents a huge win for the conservation community, which has lobbied intensely against the rule change by the Department of Environmental Protection since it was proposed a year-and-a-half ago.


In revoking the rule, the lawmakers agreed with opponents who contended the rule allowing greater density of septic tanks in parts of the 880,000-acre region is inconsistent with the legislative intent of the original law creating the New Jersey Highlands.


“Not only is the Highlands region the source of drinking water for more than half of our residents, but it also contains precious natural resources, such as clean air, forest and wetlands, pristine watersheds, and many significant historical sites and recreational opportunities,’’ said Assemblyman John McKeon (D-Essex), a sponsor of the resolution.

The state constitution gives the Legislature the authority to block new rules, but the tool has been used only once in recent years, overturning a civil service regulation adopted by the Christie administration. A previous bid to rescind another environmental rule fell short last year.


Read the full NJ Spotlight story

Like this? Use form in upper right to receive free updates
See popular posts from the last 30 days in right column —
>>

NJ lawmakers flush Christie’s Highlands septic plan Read More »

Oops, ‘drill anywhere’ means nowhere near Mar-a-Lago



Frank Brill reports for EnviroPolitics Blog:


You can imagine the phone call from President Trump to Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke.  

“Zinke, you moron, when I sent the drill-baby-drill-anywhere order I didn’t mean anywhere near Mar a Lago. How the hell are we going to entertain our friends from industry if dead oil birds are filling the sand traps.”



One week after Zinke announced that the Administration was lifting the Obama ban against gas and oil drilling off most of the nation’s coasts, he had to backpedal with the astounding announcement that the coast of Florida would be ‘off the table.’


How can the administration justify the switch?  


In a statement, Zinke said:

“I have witnessed (Florida) Governor (Rick) Scott’s leadership through hurricane season and am working closely with him on Everglades restoration. He is a straightforward leader that can be trusted. President Trump has directed me to rebuild our offshore oil and gas program in a manner that supports our national energy policy and also takes into consideration the local and state voice. I support the governor’s position that Florida is unique and its coasts are heavily reliant on tourism as an economic driver. As a result of discussion with Governor Scott’s [sic] and his leadership, I am removing Florida from consideration for any new oil and gas platforms.”

Incredible! Won’t it be news to the governors of other coastal states that towns like Virginia Beach, Ocean City, Atlantic City, the Hamptons and Cape Cod are not dependent on tourism? 

Good luck with that one

Like this? Use form in upper right to receive free updates
See popular posts from the last 30 days in right column — >> 

Oops, ‘drill anywhere’ means nowhere near Mar-a-Lago Read More »

Bill on Christie’s desk would bail out NJ solar not nukes


**UPDATE** Gov. Chris Christie pocked vetoed this bill–and others–on his last date in office on January 16, 2018. — Ed



Tom Johnson reports for NJ Spotlight:
In his final days in office, Gov. Chris Christie will decide the fate of a bill that could direct hundreds of millions of dollars in ratepayer subsidies to back an important part of the energy sector that employs up to 6,000 people in New Jersey.
The legislation, approved without debate on the final day of the lame-duck session on Monday, is not aimed at propping up three nuclear plants in South Jersey, but instead designed to avert a collapse of the state’s solar industry.
Amidst all the hoopla about legislation to subsidize the state’s nuclear plants, hardly any attention was focused on another bill (S-2276) that could commit utility customers to paying nearly $1 billion more over the next 15 years to keep the state’s solar sector afloat, according to the New Jersey Division of Rate Counsel.
That is in the same ballpark as what critics said a bailout of Public Service Enterprise Group’s nuclear plants could end up costing over a decade if that bill also had won final approval this week. The nuclear bill, however, never made it to a vote.

Waiting in the wings

The solar legislation has been kicking around in Trenton for more than a half year, touted as a short-term fix for an industry that has gone through boom-and-bust cycles. By some estimates, the sector could be headed for hard times again, unless the state ramps up mandates to increase solar to power homes and businesses, clean-energy advocates say.
But the question of handing out new subsidies to boost solar raises concerns about just how much ratepayers can absorb in trying to promote clean energy, or carbon-free electricity from nuclear power — and where those finite resources ought to be focused.
New Jersey’s solar market is at risk of coming to halt in mid-2018 after the state meets its renewable portfolio standard (RPS), which it is on track to do by this May, a full decade ahead of schedule, according to the Solar Energy Industries Association, an industry trade group.

‘Short-term fix’

“This legislation approved this week provides a crucial short-term fix that will enable the state’s solar industry to keep growing and adding jobs, while the state works on an even more ambitious long term plan,’’ said Sean Gallagher, vice president of state affairs for the association.
“It means everything to the solar industry,’’ added Lyle Rawlings, president of Advanced Solar Products in Flemington. “It’s basically to keep the industry working during a transition to protect billons of dollars of investments from going underwater.’’
New Jersey’s solar sector certainly has its share of success. It is currently the fifth-largest in the nation with 2,234 megawatts of cumulative solar capacity installed, powered, in part, by lucrative state subsidies and federal incentives.
The potential crisis hinges on the price of solar credits — dubbed solar renewable energy credits (SRECs) — given to owners of solar systems for the electricity they produce. The price of the credits, ultimately financed by ratepayers, could collapse without a new mandate to build additional solar systems. That happened five years ago, drying up investment in the sector, leading to large layoffs of solar installers.

Rate counsel opposes

Rate Counsel Stefanie Brand opposed the new mandate, saying the costs of the bill will be very high in a letter to lawmakers. “Rate Counsel’s consultants have calculated that the changes to the RPS will bring ratepayers’ exposure for the SREC program to $6.764 billion between 2018 and 2033, an increase of $938 million over the law as it stands now,’’ Brand wrote.
Rawlings and others conceded the state needs long-term changes in the solar program to make it more cost-effective and sustainable. “The new governor is going to have a whole new approach on renewables,’’ he predicted.
Like this? Use form in upper right to receive free updates
See popular posts from the last 30 days in right column —
>>

Bill on Christie’s desk would bail out NJ solar not nukes Read More »

North Carolina must redraw GOP’s gerrymandered map

Gary D. Robertson reports for the Associated Press:


RALEIGH, N.C. — Federal judges ruled Tuesday that North Carolina’s congressional district map drawn by legislative Republicans is illegally gerrymandered because of excessive partisanship that gave GOP a
rock-solid advantage for most seats and must quickly
be redone.



The ruling marks the second time this decade that the GOP’s congressional boundaries in North Carolina have been thrown out by a three-judge panel.

In 2016, another panel tossed out two majority black congressional districts initially drawn in 2011, saying there was no justification for using race as the predominant factor in forming them. The redrawn map was the basis for a new round of lawsuits.


The latest lawsuit — filed by election advocacy groups and Democrats — said the replacement for the racial gerrymander also contained unlawful partisan gerrymanders. Those who sued argued that Republican legislators went too far when they followed criteria designed to retain the party’s 10-3 majority.


At the time of debate, according to the order, House redistricting chief Rep. David Lewis attempted to justify the criteria by saying “I think electing Republicans is better than electing Democrats. So I drew this map to help foster what I think is better for the country.”

Like this? Use form in upper right to receive free updates
See popular posts from the last 30 days in right column —
>>

North Carolina must redraw GOP’s gerrymandered map Read More »

Trump-appointed regulators reject his coal, nuclear plan

Energy Secretary Rick Perry with VP Mike Pence in background



Steven Mufson reports for The Washington Post:


The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission on Monday unanimously rejected a proposal by Energy Secretary Rick Perry that would have propped up nuclear and coal power plants struggling in competitive electricity markets.


The independent five-member commission includes four people appointed by President Trump, three of them Republicans. Its decision is binding.


At the same time, the commission said that it shared Perry’s stated goal of strengthening the “resilience” of the electricity grid and directed regional transmission operators to provide information to help the commission examine the matter “holistically.” The operators have 60 days to submit materials. At that time, the agency can issue another order.


Perry’s proposal favored power plants able to store a 90-day fuel supply on site, unlike renewable energy or natural gas plants.


The plan, however, was widely seen as an effort to alter the balance of competitive electricity markets that federal regulators have been cultivating since the late 1980s. And critics said that it would have largely helped a handful of coal and nuclear companies, including the utility FirstEnergy and coal-mining firm Murray Energy, while raising rates for consumers.


Read the full story

Like this? Use form in upper right to receive free updates
See popular posts from the last 30 days in right column —
>>

Trump-appointed regulators reject his coal, nuclear plan Read More »