When, if ever, will NJ capitalize on offshore wind leases?

 

** Updated at 6:10 p.m. to add NJ Spotlight story**

New Jersey is one of the northeast states along the Atlantic where the federal government, after detailed studies, has approved and designated locations for wind energy projects. Unlike Maryland and Rhode Island, however, the Garden State continues to drag its heels on developing regulations that would enable developers to move ahead.This has jeopardized ‘first in’ opportunities to develop supporting businesses like turbine and propeller manufacturers. 

These were some of the messages delivered yesterday at a forum on offshore wind energy held at Stockton University in Galloway Township, NJ.


Pat Johnson
of The Sand Paper reports:

New Jersey’s Offshore Wind Energy is in its infancy, but it is gaining momentum and needed more than ever today in the face of climate change and rising sea levels. These were the main points to take away from the Offshore Wind Energy Forum held Tuesday at Stockton University in Galloway Township.
The movers and shakers of the infant industry came from near and far. From Washington, D.C., came Walter Cruickshank, deputy director of the Department of the Interior’s Bureau of Ocean Energy Management; from Massachusetts, Carolyn Heeps, representing RES Americas, one winner of the land lease auction held by BOEM with the right to develop wind farms off New Jersey’s coast; from Baltimore, Md., Paul Rich from US Wind Inc., the second company to win the land lease auction; and Paul Gallagher from Atlantic City, chief operating officer for Fishermen’s Energy, a company trying to develop a pilot project off A.C. Finally, U.S. Sen. Cory Booker sent a video statement of support and state Sen. Jim Whelan and Assemblyman Vince Mazzeo, both from the 2nd Legislative District, came in person.
Cruickshank gave an overview of BOEM: It holds sway over the land 3 miles from the shoreline and approximately 200 miles out to sea. It also is the department that leases land for oil and gas mining. Because of the need to reduce greenhouse gases, now, more than ever, the country needs offshore wind, he said. “The administration’s climate action plan calls for producing 20 gigawatts of wind energy by 2020.” BOEM has approved 11 offshore leases in the Atlantic, for New York, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, New Jersey, Maryland and Virginia. Plans for North and South Carolina are in the making, and Hawaii and California have also made inquiries.
“We are going to do our best to make opportunities available to companies willing to pursue this industry,” he said.
—————————————————————————————————————-

NEW JERSEY COULD STILL BE A POWERFUL PLAYER IN OFFSHORE WIND INDUSTRY

 
–NJ Spotlight

—————————————————————————————————————-

Carolyn Heeps said her British-based company, RES Americas, has plans to transfer its lease to Danish Oil and Natural Gas, or DONG, for its wind energy project. “DONG is the global leader in offshore wind,” said Heeps. Her company will work with DONG as a consultant that will be involved in the entire lifecycle of the project and will maintain management.

“The U.S. market is a great opportunity,” said Heeps. “Our target is 6 gigabytes by 2020.”
New Jersey in particular is attractive because of the strong wind resource and the shallow water plus the onshore grid connections in the state.
Although DONG manufactures turbines in Europe, Heeps said eventually it hopes to see manufacturing in the U.S. once the industry matures.
“It’s very early days. Our preliminary task is to get out and talk to the stakeholders so we can coexist with the other users of marine resources.”
Paul Rich, project developer for U.S. Wind Inc. and holder of the other large land lease off the N.J. coast, said his company has started an offshore wind farm project in Maryland. Maryland was its first choice because it has an OREC (Offshore Wind Renewable Energy Credit) system in place.
New Jersey has the law requiring OREC in its Offshore Wind Economic Development Act of 2010, but the state’s Bureau of Public Utilities has yet to fashion the way it will be used as a commodity – much as solar credits are required of nonrenewable energy companies.
As of January 2015, U.S. Wind has invested $20 million in the Maryland project that is to be built offshore of Ocean City. It has also purchased a brownfield site in Baltimore where the company will manufacture equipment and vessels to service the wind turbines.
Maryland is also requiring U.S. Wind to keep its costs down by requiring the consumer’s cost not to exceed $1.90 a kilowatt.
U.S. Wind hopes to do the same for New Jersey.
Whelan said if New Jersey had had the political will to embrace wind energy, New Jersey would have been the first to have the investment from U.S. Wind. “That manufacturing site could have been in New Jersey.”

Read the full story here


 


Was this of interest to you?




Recent blog posts:




When, if ever, will NJ capitalize on offshore wind leases? Read More »

Roundtable discussion Friday on NJ Water Quality

Alarmed by headlines about drinking water?

New Jersey Spotlight is hosting a timely roundtable

Friday, April 1, free to attendees


NJ_Spotlight_water_roundtable
  REGISTER HERE
                                      



Was this of interest to you?




Roundtable discussion Friday on NJ Water Quality Read More »

Campbell moving away from cans using chemical BPA

Campbell soup moving away from cans with BPA in linings
Campbell Soup Company said Tuesday that it is transitioning its famous soup cans away from so-called BPA linings to ones made from acrylic or polyester materials.

Eric Strauss reports in NJBIZ today:

The Camden-based food company said the transition, which has been in the works since February 2012, began this month and should be complete by mid-2017. Although the company says linings involving the chemical Bisphenol A have been in use for more than 40 years, heavily studied and regulated, consumer feedback has pushed for alternatives.
Campbell said it has tested hundreds of possible choices for can linings over the past four years, as it needed to ensure any chosen lining would be compatible with such products as tomato-based ingredients, which are naturally acidic.
“Our priority throughout this transition has been, and will continue to be, food safety,” Mike Mulshine, senior program manager, packaging, said in a prepared statement. “We have tested and conducted trials with hundreds of alternatives to BPA lining and believe the acrylic and polyester options will ensure our food remains safe, affordable and tastes great.”
Products using the non-BPA lined cans will include Campbell’s soups, gravies, Swanson brand broths and SpaghettiOs pasta.
Some other products, such as V8 beverages, are undergoing testing to find non-BPA options, Campbell added. Still other products, such as cartons and pouches, do not use BPA in their linings.


mouse click - left to right

Was this of interest to you?
Sign up for FREE updates here


Recent blog posts:
Christie’s shifting of open-space funds unconstitutional? 
Demo of Doris Duke’s NJ estate to resume today
NJ offshore wind energy forum Tuesday, March 29
Ditch wasteful plastic. Eat your cutlery
How a university should NOT react to a racism charge

 


Campbell moving away from cans using chemical BPA Read More »

Christie’s shifting of open-space funds unconstitutional?

 
Governor Christie’s decision to take nearly $20 million in state tax revenue dedicated to open space preservation and use it instead to cover parks management in his state budget was unconstitutional, according to a legal opinion issued by a non-partisan arm of the legislature.

James M. O’Neill reported March 28 in The Record:

 
But the governor’s office disputes the opinion laid out by the Office of Legislative Services, which had issued its opinion at the request of state Sen. Bob Smith, D-Middlesex, who chairs the Senate environment and energy committee. A state environmental group, meanwhile, says taking the money for other purposes jeopardizes the chance to protect sensitive land in North Jersey and elsewhere that should be preserved.

In his budget for fiscal 2016, Christie had earmarked nearly $20 million for parks management from money raised through a corporate business tax constitutionally dedicated for open space and farmland preservation. Voters had overwhelmingly approved a constitutional amendment in 2014 dedicating about $80 million annually from the corporate tax for such preservation efforts.

When the legislature, in its budget appropriations bill, changed the source of the $20 million to a clean energy fund, Christie used his line item veto power to change the source back to the preservation funds.“This is money that had been dedicated by voters for open space preservation and stewardship,” Jeff Tittel of the New Jersey Sierra Club said Monday. “We’re very concerned about this. What the governor has done is unconstitutional and unconscionable.”

Tittel also said the Christie administration has sat on the rest of the money raised through the constitutional amendment for open space preservation and failed to spend it at all. “This is an arrogant abuse of power,” Tittel said.

The Christie administration dismissed the OLS legal opinion – and the Sierra Club’s complaints.

“We disagree with OLS’s opinion,” said Joseph Perone, a spokesman with the state treasurer’s office. “This was a completely permissible use of these funds that also is consistent with the constitutional amendment approved by a majority of voters.”

Kevin Roberts, a Christie spokesman, was even more blunt in rejecting Tittel’s criticism.

“Jeff Tittel continues to set himself on fire concerning issues that he knows nothing about,” Roberts said.

The legislature, meanwhile, is trying again to ensure the $20 million in question goes to open space preservation rather than covering parks expenses. A bill introduced by Smith to do that passed the environment and energy committee in January and was approved by the full Senate, 32-5, on March 14. The bill is now awaiting action in the Assembly.


However, an identical bill passed in December at the end of the previous legislative session was vetoed by Christie without comment.

If that happens again, Tittel said the Sierra Club could seek a legal opinion from the courts.


mouse click - left to right

Was this of interest to you?
Sign up for FREE updates here


Recent blog posts:
Demo of Doris Duke’s NJ estate to resume today
NJ offshore wind energy forum Tuesday, March 29
Ditch wasteful plastic. Eat your cutlery
How a university should NOT react to a racism charge
The fishing’s hot outside nuclear plant in Lacey, NJ

Christie’s shifting of open-space funds unconstitutional? Read More »

Demo of Doris Duke’s NJ estate to resume today

Doris Duke estate before it fell into disrepair
Doris Duke’s former estate in Hillsborough, NJ before it fell into disrepair

The contractor hired to tear down the historic Doris Duke mansion in Hillsborough, NJ has returned to the property and demolition work is
expected to resume Tuesday, March 29,
Michael Catania, executive
director of the
Duke Farms Foundation, confirmed Monday.


David Hutchinson reports for NJ.com:


Crews, which had to stop work on March 6 after an Appellate Division judge’s issued an
emergency stay on the demolition, are setting up and preparing to resume razing the mansion after New Jersey Supreme Court Justice Lee Solomon ruled March 21 against the emergency stay.


“The demolition contractor has returned to Duke Farms and the demolition will resume in an orderly fashion,” said Catania.
Catania said he expects demolition on the remaining structure to resume on Tuesday. Rain on Monday delayed site work. Prior to the emergency stay about half of the mansion, a portion known as the Hollywood wing, had been demolished.
David Brook, an attorney for a citizens group call DORIS (Demolition of Residence is Senseless), had been seeking to stop the demolition until the Appellate Division hears his appeal on a vote by the township’s Historical Preservation Commission that approved razing of the structure, which was built in 1893.
Brook wasn’t immediately available for comment.

mouse click - left to right
 Was this of interest to you?

Sign up for FREE updates here 

Recent blog posts:

Demo of Doris Duke’s NJ estate to resume today Read More »

NJ offshore wind energy forum Tuesday, March 29



This looks like a great program tomorrow at Stockton University in Galloway, NJ.


It is co-sponsored by Environment New Jersey, the Stockton University Sustainability Trust and the Business Network for Off-Shore Wind


Organizers say the forum comes after the U.S. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management’s sale late last year of two leases for offshore wind energy development off the Jersey Shore to RES Americas and US Wind Inc., as well as Fishermen’s Energy continued efforts to develop a 5-turbine wind farm off the coast of Atlantic City. 


The forum will address the development plans for each developer, the opportunities for New Jersey to become a leader of an offshore wind energy industry, and the potential economic market created for this industry through the introduction of an offshore wind renewable energy credit (OREC) system. 


Panelists include representatives of the U.S. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM), RES Americas, US Wind Inc., Fishermen’s Energy, and New Jersey’s 2nd Legislative District. Also, there will be a special video statement from Senator Cory Booker directed to the audience on the importance of offshore wind energy in New Jersey.

A keynote address will be delivered by Deputy Director Walter Cruickshank of BOEM, and multiple Q & A sessions are planned. Light refreshments will be served at the forum’s conclusion.



More information is available at Enviro-Events Calendar  


Plan to attend? Please RSVP here for your general admission ticket (no cost). 


If you can’t make it, you still can listen to the entire event  via live stream.  

mouse click - left to right
       Was this of interest to you?

      Sign up for FREE updates here 




Recent blog posts: 

NJ offshore wind energy forum Tuesday, March 29 Read More »