How Cities Are Turning Food Into Fuel

One of the country’s largest foot-to-gas facilities is in Brooklyn, New York, which in 2016 began using its own Newtown Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant to process 130 tons of liquefied food waste, roughly 3 percent of the city’s daily food waste.

More and more cities are making biogas out of tons of wasted food instead of sending it to landfills.

By LJ DAWSON for Politico Magazine, 11/21/2019 

Every year, America throws away more than 80 million pounds of food. More than three-quarters of it ends up in landfills, where it takes up more room than any other kind of waste and produces as much greenhouse gases as 3.4 million vehicles.

The food waste that doesn’t end up decomposing at the dump is most commonly diverted to compost facilities that turn organic material into nutrient-rich soil. But an increasing number of municipalities around the country are looking to do even more with this untapped resource by turning it into usable energy called biogas.

Driven by legislation and public demand to limit the size of their landfills and reduce carbon footprints—eight states have food-recycling laws, six have food waste bans and even more states or cities have enacted recycling legislation—at least half a dozen American cities have begun using anaerobic digestion to handle food waste. Widespread in Europe, anaerobic digestion uses bacteria to break down organic material in an oxygen-free environment—a faster process than traditional composting, which depends on oxygen to do the work. It’s the same technology cities already use in wastewater treatment.

Top: Construction for the "waste to gas" initiative at the Newtown Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant in Brooklyn. Bottom: A view of the "setting tanks" inside the plant.
Top: Construction for the “waste to gas” initiative at the Newtown Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant in Brooklyn. Bottom: A view of the “setting tanks” inside the plant. | Sarah Blessner for Politico Magazine

Los Angeles is expanding its food-to-biogas program, a private facility recently opened in Salt Lake City to take restaurant food waste, a fuel company in Philadelphia announced plans to build a food-to-fuel processing plant last year, and in Connecticut, one anaerobic digester is running while three others are scheduled to be built.

One of the country’s largest facilities is in Brooklyn, New York, which in 2016 began using its own Newtown Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant to process 130 tons of liquefied food waste, roughly 3 percent of the city’s daily food waste. And food waste is just a fraction of the sewage that the plant handles in its eight gleaming egg-shaped silver tanks. But officials expect that Newtown will produce approximately 190 to 275 million cubic feet of natural gas for local electricity generation by next year.

Don’t miss stories like this Click for free updates

“It really is an exciting sort of sustainability circle,” said Pam Elardo, the city’s deputy commissioner of the Bureau of Wastewater Treatment.

But despite the proven technology, Newtown is still among a minority of the nation’s wastewater facilities handling food waste. Indeed, none of New York’s remaining 13 wastewater treatment plants processes food waste.

“We are at one-seventh, maybe even one-tenth of the potential of this industry,” said Patrick Serfass, the executive Director of the American Biogas Council. According the organization, there are over 2,000 anaerobic digesters in the country built to produce biogas, but most that process food waste are on farms not in cities.

Top left and right: From the top of the "digester eggs," visitors are able to look into a glass screen to see waste being processed below them. Bottom: Inside the plant, screening chambers pull out physical objects trapped in the waste water. The most common object they  must pluck out? Wet wipes.
Top left and right: From the top of the “digester eggs,” visitors are able to look into a glass screen to see waste being processed below them. Bottom: Inside the plant, screening chambers pull out physical objects trapped in the wastewater. The most common object they must pluck out? Wet wipes. | Sarah Blessner for Politico Magazine

Cities have been slow to divert food waste to anaerobic digestion because it is more expensive to start than composting and requires new sites built by private investors or costly updates to existing public infrastructure. Digesters are more expensive to build and maintain than composting facilities like the one in San Francisco, but they have the benefit of producing two valuable byproducts: a rich soil additive prized by agriculture operations and biogas, which can be sold and reused as fuel.

Serfass stresses that composting and anaerobic digestion complement each other; San Francisco uses both. Often anaerobic digesters, especially ones that process sewage and food waste like Newtown, struggle to process yard waste, such as leaves and sticks. Compost can handle it better. Digesters also work best in densely populated or high-use agriculture areas because they need a consistent and large supply of food waste.

Current federal regulations provide a disincentive to make food waste into biogas by reducing the value of renewable gas that a wastewater treatment plant produces if it includes food waste as part of its intake. Nevertheless, wastewater plants can offset their own energy costs by using the biogas they produce. Earlier this year, San Luis Obispo, California, a coastal city of 47,500, chose not to use the city’s wastewater treatment facility and instead began sending food waste to a private facility that solely processes food waste from multiple sources on the California coast.

The Newtown plant, with the Manhattan skyline on the horizon.
The Newtown plant, with the Manhattan skyline on the horizon. | Sarah Blessner for Politico Magazine

“We were able to divert all of the organic material to a facility that could capture all of the methane coming off of it and turn it into something productive,” said Jordan Lane, the city’s solid waste and recycling coordinator.

The facility, owned by Kompogas, takes in about 100,000 pounds of waste a day. The facility produces enough energy to fuel itself and 600 homes a year. The city mitigated odor issues from food waste and complied with California’s food waste diversion requirements when it switched to the anaerobic digester.

“We chose to use the digester out of convenience, sure, but also because it was arguably our best and most local option for organics treatment and disposal,” Lane wrote in an email.

Expansion is on the minds of New York officials. By 2021, Elardo hopes Newtown can ramp up from the 130 tons processed each day to 250 tons—nearly doubling its capacity, but still a long way from handling all the city’s food waste.

“It takes an investment on our side, and it takes public support to be able to drive those investments for that specific need outside of our regular business,” she said. “We could take a hundred percent of the city’s food waste. I mean, it’s not a crazy idea. What the problem is, it’s a logistics problem.”

If you liked this post you’ll love our daily newsletter, EnviroPolitics. It’s packed with the latest news, commentary and legislative updates from New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New York, Delaware…and beyond. Don’t take our word for it, try it free for an entire month. No obligation.

How Cities Are Turning Food Into Fuel Read More »

New Jersey’s Bergen County ranks #4 in the nation for PFAS in drinking water

A drinking water sample taken from a Bergen County, NJ town had one of the highest concentrations of an increasingly common group of toxic chemicals found across the nation in a survey of water systems, according to a report issued Wednesday.

By Scott Fallon, NorthJersey.com

By Scott Fallon, NorthJersey.com

The sample taken in Bergenfield in August detected 12 compounds of PFAS, a group of man-made chemicals used in everyday products for almost a century and which have been linked in recent years to cancer and other ailments.

The levels of PFAS, or polyfluoroalkyl substances, did not exceed a federal health standard for drinking water. Tests by the Suez water company, which supplies Bergenfield and dozens of other Bergen and Hudson County towns, also show PFAS levels below that standard.

But the results still ranked Bergen County number four in the nationwide survey conducted by the nonprofit Environmental Working Group.

“It’s a snapshot of what’s happening locally, but it also shows the ubiquity of PFAS in our water nationally,” said Sydney Evans, an analyst for the advocacy group and an author of the report.

The chemicals are found in non-stick pans, polishes, waxes, paints, cleaning products and firefighting foams. Brand names that contain the chemicals include Stainmaster, Scotchgard, Teflon and Gore-Tex.

PFAS compounds like PFOA, PFOS and GenX, have been found in drinking water from such upscale towns as Ridgewood in Bergen County to shore towns like Toms River to sparsely populated communities at the southwestern tip of New Jersey. 

Read the full story

If you liked this post you’ll love our daily newsletter, EnviroPolitics. It’s packed with the latest news, commentary and legislative updates from New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New York, Delaware…and beyond. Don’t take our word for it, try it free for an entire month. No obligation.

New Jersey’s Bergen County ranks #4 in the nation for PFAS in drinking water Read More »

Could your business or client benefit from $100M in new federal bioenergy funding?

A news release from the Department of Energy’s Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy — EP Editor

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) announced up to over $96 million in funding for bioenergy research and development. This funding supports the U.S. bioeconomy, as well as DOE’s goal of providing consumers and businesses with a range of domestic energy options that are affordable, reliable, and secure.

Topic areas within this FOA will advance DOE’s Bioenergy Technology Office’s objectives of reducing the price of drop-in biofuels, lowering the cost of biopower, and enabling high-value products from biomass or waste resources. Topic areas include:

  • Scale-Up of Bench Applications (up to $28M): Reducing the scale-up risk of biofuel and bioproduct processes.
  • Waste to Energy Strategies for a Bioeconomy (up to $18M): Addressing ways to use materials that are currently “waste” to make energy and new products, including strategies for municipal solid waste; wet wastes, like food and manures; and municipal wastewater treatment.
  • Algae Bioproducts and CO2 Direct-Air-Capture and Efficiency (up to $14M): Lowering the cost of algal biofuels by improving carbon efficiency, and/or by employing direct air capture technologies.
  • Bio-Restore: Biomass to Restore Natural Resources (up to $8M): Quantifying the economic and environmental benefits associated with growing energy crops, with a focus on restoring water quality and soil health.
  • Efficient Wood Heaters (up to $5M): Developing and testing low-emission, high-efficiency residential wood heaters.
  • Biopower and Products from Urban and Suburban Wastes: North American Multi-University Partnership for Research and Education (up to $15M): Developing innovative technologies to manage major forms of urban and suburban waste, with a focus on using plastic waste to make recycled products and using wastes to produce low-cost biopower.
  • Scalable CO2 Electrocatalysis (up to $8M): Developing low temperature and low-pressure CO2 electrocatalysis technologies for generating chemical building blocks.

The application process will include two phases: a concept paper and a full application. Concept papers are due on March 5, 2020, and full applications are due on April 30, 2020. For more information, read the full FOA on EERE Exchange.

We’re always looking for information that might benefit our readers. If you come across something that cries out to be shared, please send it to editor@enviropolitics.com  If we agree, you’ll see it here soon.   

Could your business or client benefit from $100M in new federal bioenergy funding? Read More »

New Jersey passes recycling market bill; organics diversion and bag ban stalled

State lawmakers got close on multiple waste and recycling bills, but most didn’t make it through. Sponsors have pledged to revive the efforts when they return for a new session later this month.

Credit: Niagara

UPDATE: Jan. 22, 2019: S3939, a bill to establish a Recycling Market Development Council, has been signed into law.

Cole Rosengren reports for WasteDive Jan. 15, 2020

The New Jersey legislature failed to reach an agreement on multiple waste and recycling bills before the end of its two-year legislative session yesterday, but momentum is expected to continue.

Among the most high-profile items was an organics diversion requirement for select large generators. The Assembly passed the bill (A3726last month, but it never came up for a vote in the Senate. Sen. Bob Smith told Politico he has a commitment from Senate President Stephen Sweeney that a new version will be taken up shortly after a Jan. 30 committee hearing.

Another major bill (S2776) passed the Senate on Monday, but failed to advance in the Assembly. It would have phased in bans on single-use plastic and paper bags, as well as expanded polystyrene foam food containers, and required straws only be given out upon request. Smith has also pledged to reintroduce a new version of that bill this month.

Both chambers did pass two notable recycling bills on Monday that now await Gov. Phil Murphy’s signature. The first (S3939) would establish a Recycling Market Development Council to assess state needs and recommend solutions. The second (A4382) would establish a state stewardship program for architectural paint.

Like this? Click to receive free EP Blog updates

Given the session deadline, multiple bills appear to have run out of time to resolve political disagreements – some of which were complicated by late-stage amendments – and must now be introduced anew. Despite these partial results, waste and recycling topics appear to be gaining momentum as municipalities throughout the state struggle with rising costs.

Those concerns are best evidenced by the passage of S3939, which was spurred by a committee hearing last summer to address local recycling issues. Local governments in New Jersey cannot consider canceling their recycling programs due to state requirements – unlike in some other parts of the country – but are still faced with the same cost pressures. The bill mirrors similar legislation passed recently in states such as California and Washington to focus more on market development.

If the bill is signed, Murphy will be expected to appoint members to the new council within 60 days, who will have one year to prepare a report. In addition to assessing existing markets for recyclable materials, the council will also be asked to explore a range of topics such as contamination reduction, local market development (including possible incentives for paper mills), procurement standards for recycled content and other relevant policy recommendations.

The Association of New Jersey Recyclers (ANJR), which has long been advocating for a revival of the state’s solid waste advisory committee, formed its own market development committee last year to kickstart discussions. S3939 stipulates that ANJR will be represented on this new state council. Executive Director Marie Kruzan told Waste Dive she sees an opportunity for the two groups to work together on finding solutions that could wind up in the recommendation report.

Read the full story

New Jersey passes recycling market bill; organics diversion and bag ban stalled Read More »

Arizona’s biggest utility, which fought renewables in 2018, now wants to go carbon-free

Arizona Public Service chairman and CEO Jeff Guldner poses for a portrait Tuesday, Jan. 21, 2020, in Phoenix. (AP Photo/Ross D. Franklin)
Arizona Public Service chairman and CEO Jeff Guldner poses for a portrait Tuesday, Jan. 21, 2020, in Phoenix. (AP Photo/Ross D. Franklin)

BY DINO GRANDONI with Paulina Firozi / Wash. Post

Arizona’s biggest electric utility spent millions of dollars in 2018 to defeat a renewable energy ballot initiative. Just two years later, it now says it wants to get all of its power from carbon-free sources.

As Steven Mufson and I report this morning, Arizona Public Service announced an ambitious plan to wean itself entirely off fossil fuels by 2050, with the intermediate goal of getting nearly two-thirds of its electricity from nuclear and renewable sources by 2030.

The drastic about-face for the electric utility is a sign of how the political climate has changed. 

Not receiving our free updates?

Voters rejected the measure shifting the state to renewables in the 2018 election, even after billionaire environmentalist Tom Steyer’s campaign in support of the ballot measure known as Proposition 127 brought the total amount spent on both sides to at least $62.8 million. APS’s announcement makes it less likely there will another big ballot initiative fight in future elections.

“I am very encouraged by the news from Arizona Public Service this morning and I am also happy that our efforts behind Proposition 127 in 2018 are finally moving Arizona to a more clean energy future,” Steyer, who is now a Democratic candidate for president, said in a statement Wednesday morning. “The plan put forth by APS shows that when public interest advocates keep pushing energy companies, they can get real results.”

In its own news release, APS said that after the ballot initiative fight the utility “took a hard look at our generation mix and future plans” when setting its carbon-free energy goals.

APS’s plan, which is not legally binding, outstrips the modest renewable requirements already on the books in Arizona that mandate that it rely on renewable energy for 15 percent of supplies by 2025. Yet it’s especially striking since the electric utility poured $37.9 million into a campaign to defeat the ballot initiative, which would have required APS to meet a similar goal — generating 50 percent of its power from renewable sources by 2030.

Read the full story

Arizona’s biggest utility, which fought renewables in 2018, now wants to go carbon-free Read More »

Mining Executives Face Homicide Charges in Brazil Dam Disaster

A year after a dam burst killed at least 259 people, prosecutors accused company executives of covering up safety concerns.

By Ernesto Londoño and Manuela Andreoni, NY Times

RIO DE JANEIRO — Prosecutors in Brazil on Tuesday charged the former president of the Brazil-based mining giant Vale and 15 other people with homicide, faulting them for negligence in a dam disaster that killed at least 259 people a year ago.

Those charged include Vale’s former chief executive, Fabio Schvartsman, and other senior officials employed by Vale and by a German firm hired to assess the stability of its dams. They were also charged with environmental crimes, as were the companies.

The announcement came days before the first anniversary of one of the deadliest mining disasters in years.

The dam in Brumadinho, in the state of Minas Gerais, was built to hold waste from an iron ore mine. When it burst on Jan. 25, 2019, the company cafeteria and other facilities were buried in a torrent of mud.

On Tuesday, one of the state prosecutors who brought the charges, William Garcia Pinto Coelho, said Vale had executives systematically hide evidence of safety concerns and retaliated against auditing firms that flagged problems.

And the German firm Tüv Süd, Mr. Pinto Coelho said, was compensated for knowingly presenting Vale with misleading reports about the stability of its dams.

Prosecutors said they had found evidence that Vale officials knew Brumadinho’s dam was at risk since at least November 2017. It was on an internal list of 10 dams at risk of bursting, they learned.

“The goal of these omissions, ultimately, was to avoid any negative impacts to Vale’s reputation that could affect its market value,” Mr. Pinto Coelho said.

Read the full story

If you liked this post you’ll love our daily newsletter, EnviroPolitics. It’s packed with the latest news, commentary and legislative updates from New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New York, Delaware…and beyond. Don’t take our word for it, try it free for an entire month. No obligation.

Mining Executives Face Homicide Charges in Brazil Dam Disaster Read More »