Pa. commission OK’s new oil and gas regulations

                                                                                                       WHYY photo
A state commission has signed off on significant changes to rules governing Pennsylvania’s oil and gas industry. The approval signals a final step in an often contentious, five-year effort by the Department of Environmental Protection to modernize drilling regulations.
Marie Cusick reports for StateImpact:

After a seven-hour public meeting Thursday, the Independent Regulatory Review Commission (IRRC) voted 3-2 to give the green-light. The commission is charged with evaluating regulations for economic impact, public health and safety, reasonableness, impact on small businesses, and clarity.

The state House and Senate Environmental Resources and Energy committees now have 14 days to review IRRC’s decision.
“I believe the department has addressed this regulation as earnestly and honestly as it claims it has– intending to balance the interests of the affected industries and the public good,” says IRRC commissioner Murray Ufberg. “ [The regulations] have not been modified in so many years, and the industry has undergone dramatic changes which affect our population.”
The regulations, known as Chapter 78 and 78a govern both conventional drillers and the newer, unconventional, Marcellus Shale industry. Changes include updates to the permitting process. Drillers will now have to identify public resources such as schools and playgrounds. They will also have to identify old or abandoned wells that could be impacted by new drilling. If a water supply is tainted, the driller will have to restore or replace it to federal Safe Drinking Water Act standards, or the pre-drilling conditions, if they were better. The Marcellus Shale industry would also be barred from storing waste in pits, and using brine for dust suppression or de-icing.
 

Pa. commission OK’s new oil and gas regulations Read More »

Founder of Brandywine Conservancy and Museum, 79

George A. “Frolic” Weymouth, 79, a prominent conservationist and artist who founded and chaired the Brandywine Conservancy & Museum of Art, died Sunday morning at his home in Chadds Ford, the conservancy said.

George Weymouth´s legacy includes 62,000 acres of protected land.

Chris Palmer writes today for Philly.com that Mr. Weymouth had been hospitalized recently for pneumonia, according to Andrew Stewart, a spokesman for the organization.
Mr. Weymouth, a member of the du Pont family, was a seminal force in preserving tens of thousands of acres of picturesque scenery around the Brandywine River in Pennsylvania and Delaware. He also was an accomplished painter and combined his passion for nature and the arts by helping to establish the Brandywine Conservancy & River Museum of Art in 1967.
Nearly 50 years later, the organization has protected 62,000 acres, and the museum, which houses 4,000 pieces of art in a renovated grist mill, has become world renowned for its galleries showcasing the work of the Wyeth family, whose members were close friends with Mr. Weymouth.

Read the full story here 

Recent blog posts: 
In Pa’s fracklands, local economies feel pinch of a gas bust 
Exxon, allies invoke 1st Amendment to fight climate probe 
Christie looks to divert $20M in NJ conservation funding 
How Google’s celebrating Earth Day. How about you? 
Task force recommends changes to NJ beach-access law

Founder of Brandywine Conservancy and Museum, 79 Read More »

In Pa’s fracklands, local economies feel pinch of a gas bust


















In today’s Philadelphia Inquirer, business writer Andrew Maykuth reports on how the plunge in natural gas prices has affected drillers
and businesses in Jones Township, Pa.


Gus Trejo, a career oil-and-gas driller from South Texas, moved his family to Pennsylvania in 2010, betting that the emerging Marcellus Shale gas industry would provide long-term security.
“Retirement is what I was thinking,” he said.

Trejo supervised three drill rigs in this remote corner of Elk County for Seneca Resources Corp. until the industry crashed last year. He now manages one site, Seneca’s sole remaining rig in the entire state. He’s glad just to still be employed.
“Now, I’m sitting on the edge of my seat,” said Trejo, 50, whose two brothers also resettled near his Tioga County livestock farm, though one has since returned to Texas. “I hope things get better and we stick around a lot longer. I like this part of the country.”

Natural gas boom and bust in Pa chart
Five years ago, the Marcellus Shale bonanza attracted 115 drilling rigs to the state, each requiring a battalion of suppliers, trucks, earth movers, equipment manufacturers, and support services.
This month, the rig count fell to 16, a number not experienced since 2007, before hydraulic fracturing entered the public debate and when Marcellus was just a gangster in Pulp Fiction.
Last year’s energy-price plunge undercut the business across the nation. Gas producers that borrowed heavily to acquire acreage and to drill struggled to cover their debt. They cut operations and sold assets to stay solvent. Some went bankrupt. Those financially strong enough to survive are hunkered down.
“We’re going through a historic downturn,” said David J. Spigelmyer, president of the Marcellus Shale Coalition, an industry trade group.

“We lost maybe $10 billion in capital spending in 2015, and are heading the same way in 2016 with the rig count.

“Despite the slowdown in drilling, Pennsylvania is not likely to relinquish its new status as a natural gas giant. In 2008, it produced 198 million cubic feet of gas, about a quarter of the state’s needs. Last year, Pennsylvania produced 4.6 trillion cubic feet, a fifth of the nation’s gas demand.
The volume of gas production remains stable because of the large inventory of wells awaiting pipeline connections. As soon as the price rises, a producer brings a waiting gas well online. Producers expect the drilling slowdown to last at least 18 months.

Still, the downturn has depressed local economies. The traffic that energized and disrupted rural life has subsided. Sales of clothing, food, and vehicles are down. Skilled welders have taken jobs at Walmart. Unemployed workers stay home and don’t spend.
“Just the sheer volume of people in restaurants, hotels, even at some charity events, they’re definitely not there anymore,” said Stan Foster, chief operating officer of Superior Energy Resources L.L.C., a Brockway, Pa., gas field-services company.
Three years ago, competition for skilled help was so fierce that Superior struggled to fill job vacancies. “During the peak we had up over 130 employees,” Foster said. “Now, we’re at 20. Of course, sales are also right in line parallel with that curve.”
At midday recently, it was practically empty at the Mountain Inn in Clermont, McKean County, a bar and restaurant where once it was not uncommon for rig crews to order takeout of 30 hamburgers at a time. A game warden had come by that morning to install a trap for the most demanding patron, a black bear that raided the inn’s dumpster. It left a lot of debris and, like a growing number of customers, no tip.
“Usually, we’d have a full bar now,” said Brenda Walker, the inn’s owner. She has cut hours and reduced her staff from nine full-time employees to four part-timers.
“The past year has been horrible,” Walker said. “The best thing that can be said is we had a few good years.”

In Pa’s fracklands, local economies feel pinch of a gas bust Read More »

Exxon, allies invoke 1st Amendment to fight climate probe

Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey (C) speaks at a news conference with New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman (R) and other U.S. State Attorney's General to announce a state-based effort to combat climate change in the Manhattan borough of New York City, March 29, 2016. REUTERS/Mike Segar
Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey, center, joined a coalition of her colleagues seeking climate action and considering investigations of Exxon.
Credit: Reuters

Exxon, the Competitive Enterprise Institute, and their allies are invoking free speech protections in a pugnacious pushback against subpoenas from attorneys general seeking decades of documents on climate change. Their argument is that the state-level investigations violate the First Amendment rights of those who question climate science. Neela Banerjee reports for the Pulitzer-Prize-winning blog insight Climate News: Exxon has sued to block a subpoena issued by the attorney general of the U.S. Virgin Islands, and in an unusual step, named as a defendant the Washington, D.C. law firm and attorney representing the territory in the inquiry. In its complaint against the Virgin Islands subpoena, Exxon wrote, “The chilling effect of this inquiry…strikes at protected speech at the core of the First Amendment.” In a pointed letter to Virgin Islands Attorney General Claude Walker on April 20, CEI’s attorney called the subpoena “offensive” and “un-American,” and warned to “expect a fight.” Andrew Grossman, outside counsel for CEI, wrote, “You have no right to wield your power as a prosecutor to advance a policy agenda by persecuting those who disagree with you.” The conservative non-profit Energy & Environment Legal Institute, an ally of CEI, recently released emails that show that the attorneys general considering investigating Exxon were briefed by two environmentalists. E&E got the emails through a Freedom of Information Act request to the Vermont attorney general’s office. Though such meetings with environmental and industry advocates are widely considered routine, E&E described the meetings as secretive collusion, an idea that has been echoed on conservative websites and among some mainstream media outlets. The AGs have not changed course amid the counterattack. But Exxon and its allies appear to be aiming as much at public opinion as at state law enforcement. After Inside Climate News and later the Los Angeles Times published stories last year detailing Exxon’s cutting edge climate research in the 1970s and its subsequent efforts to disparage climate science, the company initially argued it has conducted climate science without interruption for 40 years. It also answered a subpoena by New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman and produced 10,000 pages of records by the end of 2015. Now, its emphasis appears to have shifted. As the company tries to defend its climate contrarian stance, Exxon argues that it has voiced honest dissent on the science that a conspiracy of environmentalists and attorneys general wants to silence. “Our critics, on the other hand, want no part of that discussion. Rather, they seek to stifle free speech and limit scientific inquiry while painting a false picture of ExxonMobil,” spokeswoman Suzanne McCarron wrote in a post on the company’s blog on April 20 titled “The Coordinated Attack on ExxonMobil.” Exxon and CEI’s lawyers have experience waging long battles with government attorneys on controversial cases. Exxon’s law firm Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison and CEI’s attorneys, Baker Hostetler, represented the tobacco industry for years. Exxon’s firm also represents the National Football League as it deals with the scandal over its concussion research. Read the full story here Recent blog posts:
Christie looks to divert $20M in NJ conservation funding 
How Google’s celebrating Earth Day. How about you? 
Task force recommends changes to NJ beach-access law 
Should fracking states put something away for a rainy day? 
Former pesticide plant site in NJ added to Superfund list

Exxon, allies invoke 1st Amendment to fight climate probe Read More »

Christie looks to divert $20M in NJ conservation funding

                                                                                  Photo credit: Newsworks
The Christie administration’s diversion of $20 million from an open-space fund to pay salaries at state parks was condemned yesterday at a legislative hearing in what is emerging as an acrimonious side battle over next year’s budget.
Tom Johnson reports today in NJ Spotlight:

In a hearing before the Senate Environment and Energy Committee, open-space advocates argued such diversions were never contemplated by voters in the fall of 2014 when they easily approved a new constitutional amendment setting aside corporate business taxes to fund acquisition of undeveloped land and farmland preservation.

The diversion, which first took place in last year’s budget, would be repeated in this year’s fiscal spending plan for the state under a proposal submitted by Gov. Chris Christie. Sen. Bob Smith (D-Middlesex), the committee chairman and sponsor of the ballot question, called the rerouting of the funds “unconstitutional,’’ and possibly criminal.

RELATED LINKS
SENATE BILL S-969

Last month, the Office of Legislative Services issued a legal opinion that concluded the use of the funds to pay state employees’ salaries at parks is not authorized under language in the current budget, a position disputed by the Christie administration. It said the diversion is a permissible use of the funds consistent with the constitutional amendment.
Meanwhile, the Legislature has given final approval to a bill (S-969), now on the Governor’s desk, that would allocate $146 million over the next two years to fund open space, farmland, and historic preservation, but it includes no money for park salaries. Those operations traditionally have come out of the general fund.
“My belief is we probably will get a veto, maybe a conditional veto, but a veto,’’ Smith said of the bill. An identical bill won approval early in January in the lame-duck session, but was pocket vetoed by the governor without any explanation of why he objected to the measure.
Smith’s priority now is to begin allocating money from the new, approved open-space fund, none of which has been spent yet on its intended purposes. “How do we get to the finish line? You would think a constitutional amendment would have been enough,’’ he said.
Recent blog posts: 

Christie looks to divert $20M in NJ conservation funding Read More »

How Google’s celebrating Earth Day. How about you?

If you use any of the plethora of Google tools, like Chrome, Search, Google +, Blogger, etc., you likely were met today with a graphic reminding you that today is Earth Day. 


We like the four we’ve seen so far.

   
Are you, your business, or organization doing anything special this year to mark the event?
Click the ‘comment’ link below and share it with your fellow EnviroPolitics Blog readers.

Recent blog posts: 

How Google’s celebrating Earth Day. How about you? Read More »