The greening of the Big American Beer supply chain

Two major American beer brewers are growing greener –and we’re not talking about producing that colored stuff that some pubs serve on Saint Patrick’s Day. 
GreenBiz Group Associate Editor Lauren Hepler writes in the article below that "the big names in beer are also refining their own production methods to maximize efficiency and address nagging sustainability challenges."
For most casual drinkers, beer is beer. It can be hoppy or mild, light or dark, but the finished product often doesn’t convey the months of intense agricultural legwork and processing that it takes to get your favorite brews bottle-ready.
As craft brewers continue to gain market share, particularly in urban markets flush with disposable income, the big names in beer are also refining their own production methods to maximize efficiency and address nagging sustainability challenges.
Water use and the process of growing barley are two primary areas of focus for MillerCoors and Anheuser-Busch InBev, particularly as risk factors like water scarcity become more prevalent and new precision agriculture technologies hit the market.
"It really needs to be farmer centric," John Rogers, global director of agricultural development at Anheuser-Busch InBev, told GreenBiz. "We look at economic value creation as well as environmental."
beer sustainable brewing
                 

Faferek – There’s much more than meets the eye involved in brewing beer.

That process increasingly entails not only calculating the relatively straightforward economic costs of producing beer, but also harder-to-quantify natural capital costs.
The Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) this week released new disclosure and accounting guidance for sectors including the alcoholic beverage business. Among the biggest issues facing the beer industry: water and energy usage, agricultural risks, waste generation and local impacts on communities where ingredients are grown.
As the two biggest brewers in the U.S., Anheuser-Busch and MillerCoors have outsized potential to forge models that address these sustainability challenges — and there are high financial stakes for both.
Anheuser-Busch InBev, which has dual headquarters in Brazil and Belgium and a market cap of $197 billion, has cornered about 25 percent of the global beer market with brands like Budweiser, Corona and Stella Artois. The company uses 5 million metric tons of barley annually and works directly with upwards of 20,000 barley growers.
MillerCoors, meanwhile, was born in 2008 with the launch of a joint venture between SABMiller and Molson Coors Brewing Company. The Chicago-based U.S. arm of the companies produces and markets beers including Miller, Coors, Molson and Blue Moon. All told, the company tallied $7.8 billion in sales last year.
“We need to be really strong leaders with what we’re doing," MillerCoors Chief Sustainability Officer Kim Marotta told GreenBiz.

Watering down risks

To make beer, you need water. By some academic estimates, the liquid resource accounts for 90-95 percent of beer by mass.
 
In addition to California’s ongoing severe drought, many major brewers — along with big, industrial users in many other sectors — rely at least in part on water from other severely depleted sources, like the Colorado River.
Agricultural and brewing operations that rely on fragile watersheds expose beer companies to enhanced risk.
"Because alcoholic beverage companies rely heavily on access to a large volume of clean water and water stress is increasing in different regions globally, companies may be exposed to supply disruptions that could significantly impact operations and add to costs," SASB explains.

"Companies operating in water-stressed regions that fail to address local water concerns may face further risk of losing their social license to operate."



Was this of value to you? Click here for free updates  
The social media icons below make it easy to share this.


The greening of the Big American Beer supply chain Read More »

Will DuPont spinoff be able to cover all its cleanup bills?

Lisa J. Riggiola wasn’t among those cheering DuPont’s official spinoff of the Chemours chemical company this week, Jeff Montgomery and Jeff Mordock report in The News Journal (Wilmington, DE). 
Riggiola, a Pompton Lakes, NJ, resident who grew up in the borough and served on its council, worries Chemours could be crippled by the weight of nationwide pollution cleanup bills the company carried away from DuPont’s remaining enterprises. Those expenses, she said, might weaken Chemours’ ability to follow through on a more-than-500-acre cleanup at a former DuPont explosives plant in her community.
“To me, it’s a sad day because I don’t know what’s going to happen,” said Riggiola, a member of a community advisory group. The organization recently asked federal officials to investigate the new company’s ability to meet its obligations for cleaning up mercury, lead and other pollutants in soil, lake sediments and groundwater, including toxic solvent vapors surfacing under hundreds of homes.
Chemours this week completed its spinoff from DuPont and launched as an independent, publicly traded company, with headquarters in Wilmington.
“DuPont managed the environmental liabilities extremely well, and I am confident we will continue to do that.”

Marc Vergnano, Chemours CEO

At spots around Delaware, New Jersey and across the country, Chemours is now tied to 190 current or potential DuPont legacy cleanup sites under various programs.
Company legal disclosures estimated the cleanup liability at $295 million, with a possibility of topping $1 billion. Thousands of toxic-exposure, asbestos and contamination claims also are working through court systems nationwide, with a large number focused on water-supply contamination in West Virginia and Ohio.
Company officials have said they are confident the obligations will be covered, although Pompton Lakes, a former explosives plant, was identified as the lone site where expenses might have a “material” effect on company liquidity for a period, but not its overall financial position.
“These are well-characterized liabilities,” said Marc Vergnano, a former DuPont executive vice president and Chemours’ first CEO. “DuPont managed the environmental liabilities extremely well, and I am confident we will continue to do that.”

Was this of value to you? Click here for free updates  
The social media icons below make it easy to share this. 


Will DuPont spinoff be able to cover all its cleanup bills? Read More »

Proposal would require faster reporting of pipeline spills

                                                                                                                                   UPI photo by Brian Kersey


A proposal requiring pipeline operators to report spills within an hour of their discovery will help mitigate damage, the U.S. transportation secretary said, UPI reports.

The Department of Transportation’s Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration is proposing a mandate that would require pipeline operators to issue spill notifications no later than one hour after a confirmed release.
"We constantly seek to raise the bar on safety," Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx said in a statement. "This proposed rule will improve safety in a number of ways, including a notification time limit which eliminates any ambiguity about timeliness in reporting and is crucial to the ability to mitigate damage and protect people, property and the environment following an incident."
Existing federal regulations only advise operators to issue notifications at the earliest practicable opportunity, which the government estimates at between one and two hours after a confirmed release.
A pipeline operated by Plains All American leaked as much as 2,500 barrels of oil in Santa Barbara County in mid-May. The company said it notified federal authorities one hour and one minute after shutting down pumps controlling the pipeline May 19.
According to an account from the National Transportation Safety Board, Enbridge took 17 hours to recognize a leak on Line 6b in southern Michigan in 2010. The leak was among the largest ever inland spills in U.S. history.

Proposal would require faster reporting of pipeline spills Read More »

Gov Christie nominates two for farming and water panels

New Jersey Governor Chris Christie filed the following nominations on June 29.
Both are subject to the advice and consent of the State:
State Agriculture Development Committee
Farmer representative
Walter Scott Ellis (Hamilton, Mercer)

Water Supply Advisory Council
Agricultural Community Representative

David R. Specca (Bordentown, Burlington)


Was this of value to you? Click here for free updates  
The social media icons below make it easy to share this. 




Gov Christie nominates two for farming and water panels Read More »

Hydropower keeps this old mill (and more) grinding away






Our ancestors made the most of what they had.That included using the power of streams and rivers to power their saw mills and grain mills and early manufacturing plants. Today, In the age of coal, natural gas, nuclear, wind and solar, we often wonder whether we’re not overlooking this valuable, renewable energy source.

So, we were pleasantly surprised to learn from the U.S. Department of Energy that "hydropower remains the most common and least expensive source of renewable electricity in the United States."


According to the recently released hydropower market report, roughly seven percent of the country’s electricity is produced from hydropower resources.


Still grinding along, for example, is a grain mill owned and operated by six generations of the Weisenberger family in the heart of Kentucky since the Civil War.

DOE Communications Specialist Sarah Wagoner writes:

"In 1862, August Weisenberger emigrated from Baden, Germany, to start milling grains in Midway, Kentucky. He purchased the existing three-story stone mill on the banks of South Elkhorn Creek in 1865—the perfect location to harness water power to operate the mill.

 
"By 1913, the old mill had become structurally unsound and was demolished and later rebuilt. The family also replaced the water wheel with more efficient twin hydropower turbine and generator units, boosting their local electric supply. As the family-owned business—Weisenberger Mills Inc.—grew and added more equipment through the years, they supplemented their onsite power generation with electricity from the local utility.

"More recently, with a $56,000 Energy Department award, Weisenberger Mills installed a generator and power electronics in 2013.  The new system utilizes water flowing through the turbines more efficiently, generating enough power to run the mill when it’s grinding grain. Eventually, the generator will operate 24/7 and produce more than enough power for all the mill’s needs; and using net metering, Weisenberger Mills may even sell back electricity to the utility as needed.

"Equipped with a permanent magnet generator controlled by a variable speed drive—a device where magnets rotate around conducting wires to generate electricity—the new system better captures the varied flow of the creek, which results in improved annual energy production. Small hydropower projects like this, ranging between 100 kilowatts and 30 megawatts in capacity, can efficiently convert energy from low-head stream flows and often use existing infrastructure with little to no environmental impact.
"These days, other than the new generator, most of the mill’s operations of grinding, mixing, and sifting are done using circa-1913 machines. The mill grinds about 1,000 bushels of grain a week and buys all of it from within 100 miles of Midway, further reducing the mill’s overall carbon footprint."

Learn more about hydropower at the DOE’s Water Power Program’s website.


Was this of value to you?
Click here for free updates 

The social media icons below make it easy to share this.

Recent Blog Posts: 

Hydropower keeps this old mill (and more) grinding away Read More »

NJ Senate: Hands off enviro cleanup, restoration payments

Morses Creek, turned into a lagoon for waste products at Bayway Refinery in Linden, NJ (Stephen Nesssen – WNYC)
“After repeated vetoes by Gov. Chris Christie, the state Senate on Monday passed a constitutional amendment to require that settlement money from polluters be spent almost exclusively on restoring the environment,” Christopher Baxter reports for NJ.com.

The measure (SCR163) would dedicate money received from lawsuits against polluters solely “to repair damage to, restore, or permanently protect the state’s natural resources,” with the exception of up to 5 percent for administrative costs.

Democrats want the change in response to the Christie administration’s proposed $225 million settlement in a long-running case against Exxon, a deal they say sells the state short in a battle that had estimated damages as high as $9 billion.

The measure passed 27-12, which is more than the three-fifths needed to put it on the ballot in November. The Assembly must pass it by the same margin by August to seek voter approval this year. Otherwise, it would probably be next year.

  Was this of value to you? Click here for free updates 
  The social media icons below make it easy to share this. 

Recent Blog Posts: 



NJ Senate: Hands off enviro cleanup, restoration payments Read More »